Best Mpg Cars 2023 Non Hybrid – The US Environmental Protection Agency’s fuel economy rating is the standard for most people when comparing the fuel economy of different vehicles. Scientific, rigorous, and most importantly, repeatable tests under laboratory conditions are the best way to demonstrate the relative performance of different cars and trucks.
EPA mpg numbers are mentioned in ads and car window stickers, and the tests behind them aren’t very good at showing how each car performs in the real world outside of the lab. EPA highway fuel economy estimates are obtained from testing at an average travel speed of 48.3 mph, a speed that would sound off and on on most American highways. In looking for actual mpg numbers, we found a test that’s closer to what most people drive (read: fast). Each car will be driven 200 miles on Michigan’s I-94 from Ann Arbor to Kalamazoo, during which we will simulate cruise control as best we can and try to maintain a GPS-approved speed of 75 mph. How real drivers behave on long journeys. The results are sometimes surprising and sometimes scary, for example, 13 non-hybrid cars from 2017 or 2018 have more than 40 miles (out of more than 400 cars we evaluated):
Best Mpg Cars 2023 Non Hybrid
Jaguar’s mid-size XF sedan might not come to mind when you think of a performance car, but for 2017 it has 180 horsepower. The model is equipped with a turbo-diesel 2.0 liter, all-wheel drive and an eight-speed automatic. fuel in our hands at the rate of one gallon per 40 miles. Those numbers match the diesel XF’s EPA highway fuel economy estimates. Yes, we realize the 2017 model year is long gone, but the XF and its diesel powertrain remain unchanged for 2018.
Review: 2023 Kia Sportage Hybrid Grows Up And Offers All New Efficiency
The BMW 3 Series sedan comes in many flavors. It can have a turbo-diesel engine, a plug-in hybrid electric powertrain, a nice straight six, or a twin-turbocharged four-cylinder engine. Regardless of its motivations, the 3 Series is a comfortable and luxurious entry-luxury sedan, which makes the 2017 330i surprisingly good at 41 mpg on our highway test. Sure, our test car came with the optional eight-speed automatic transmission and lacked the big wheel engine, but it still beat the EPA’s 34 mpg highway fuel economy by 8 mpg! Also keep in mind that the 330i 3 uses a four-cylinder twin-turbo engine more powerful (making 248 horsepower) and sprints to 60 mph in 5.4 seconds.
Although the Honda Fit is not economical, you measure it by price, space savings or fuel economy. On the latter topic, unsurprisingly, the Fit Sport model managed 41 mpg on our highway fuel cycle, beating the EPA highway estimate by 5 mpg. The Fit can also have a continuously variable automatic transmission (CVT). While the manual model we tested was rated at 36 mpg on the highway, the CVT-equipped model (which we didn’t test) carried a big four zeros on the window sticker that couldn’t even be a Fit Sport. the most efficient of the bunch.
Like many subcompact cars, Ford’s full-size Fiesta has buyers chasing value and efficiency. Ford even sells a 1.0-liter turbocharged three-cylinder engine with EPA-estimated fuel economy in the Fiesta family for especially discerning customers. That engine option was discontinued for 2018, so the Fiesta didn’t need to break the 40-mile barrier in our highway fuel economy test. Instead, the Fiesta’s standard 1.6-liter four-cylinder engine, paired with an automatic transmission, is rated for 41 mpg on the highway, 4 mpg better than the EPA estimate. Surprisingly, the Fiesta is fun to drive!
After a complete facelift for 2018, the Accent is both very fun (no, seriously, it’s really fast) and a comfortable economy box. With an EPA-estimated highway rating of 37 mpg, weight and minimal distortion, the base-shift Accent SE sedan we tested seemed to work well on our 75-mph highway. We’re not disappointed: The Accent returns 41 mpg. Opting for the optional six-speed automatic transmission Accent promises slight improvements (up to 1 mm on the highway), according to EPA estimates.
Most Fuel Efficient Cars
Jaguar’s diesel turbocharged four-cylinder engine makes its second appearance on this list, this time in the Jaguar XE compact sedan. As equipped as our test car, the XE diesel is rated by the EPA at 40 mpg on the highway. It’s better than ours, at 42mm on a real-world stem cycle. We reckon the diesel XE can take 620 miles on a tank of fuel, taking the stress out of long journeys.
1.5 liter inline-four Honda Civic Si is a tuned version of the same engine (and higher efficiency) found in the Civic model. However, the 2017 sedan’s manual engine surprisingly managed 1 mpg more on our highway fuel cycle than the CVT-equipped Civic Touring. (The Si doesn’t see any changes for 2018, so those numbers should include the latest Si model.) It’s a small difference in the scheme of things, but the Si’s fuel economy isn’t why we chose the Si. to the feet of the citizens; Instead, Si’s superior handling and high price compared to other sports compacts are responsible for this desire.
The Kia Forte gets a new look and new power for 2019, but it’s one of the most efficient hybrids we’ve tested. In 2017, the Forte S did an efficient 42 mpg on our highways, improving its EPA highway rating by 4 mpg. 2018 Forte’s EPA-estimated highway fuel economy has dropped 1 mpg to 37, but without mechanical changes, we expect the sedan will still be capable of more than 40 mpg, the same as last year.
With the name Eco, it’s no surprise that the Elantra and its small-displacement turbocharger tested our highway fuel economy. Already rated at 40 mpg on the highway, the Elantra Eco squeezed out 43 mpg during our real-world evaluation. Elantra Limited, which uses a 2.0-liter four- and six-speed automatic transmission is larger than the seven-speed dual-clutch automatic, returned 42 mm in the same test, so the Elantra family member has a lot of fuel. They don’t have Eco in their name.
Most Fuel Efficient Non Hybrid Crossovers Of 2020
Long and boxy vehicles, like cars, pose aerodynamic challenges, resulting in poor fuel economy compared to smaller vehicles. That makes the all-wheel-drive Chevrolet Equinox’s top speed of 43 mph even more impressive. The first crossover to break the 40 mph barrier in our auto test, the diesel-powered Equinox requires some sacrifices from the driver: its 137 horsepower is unimpressive and responsible for sprinting 9.4 seconds to 60 miles from where it stops.
The entire Honda Civic lineup is incredibly efficient, as evidenced by the Si version, and almost every version is rated at 35 mpg highway and better by the EPA. Between the combination of the Civic’s head-turning powertrain and body style, this sporty hatchback model with a standard six-speed manual was tested for fuel economy on a 200-mile highway. The result is a stellar 43-mm. For reference, the CVT-equipped Civic Touring sedan came within 1 mpg of the EPA estimate in our testing, but that’s still pretty rough.
The Toyota Camry has been redesigned for 2018, and while we’re not overly impressed with the performance of the new four-cylinder, it’s more fun to drive than before. Even in the “sporty” SE trim, which has a low EPA rating of 39 mpg highway (non-SE trims are rated at 41 mpg), it made the cut in our real-world highway testing. 45 mpg return. What’s more, the best results of gasoline-powered cars, Camry was more efficient on the highway than some hybrids, including Chevrolet Malibu, Toyota Prius C and Hyundai Ioniq variants. The real kicker? This Camry even beats the 2018 Camry Hybrid by 1 mph.
Even if the diesel-powered Chevrolet Cruze meets our EPA highway rating of 47 mpg, it’ll still impress us. Instead, the diesel Cruze, which shares an engine with the diesel Equinox but uses a nine-speed automatic instead of the Equinox’s six-speed, beats its EPA fuel economy by 5 mpg, at 52 mpg. Even in a hybrid, that kind of fuel economy car is hard to beat, and the Cruze’s 700-mile auto cruise range makes it the perfect shower companion.
Toyota Corolla Cross Hybrid Brings Extra Efficiency
The new book marks the two paths of the Diamond Jubilee of 356